legal defense​

Fighting for your right

Protecting Civil Liberties

We are committed to justice at all levels. We challenge discriminatory laws like Bill 21, defend humanitarian aid like UNRWA, and ensure judicial accountability.

Our team also supports the community by helping families through hate-motivated attacks, addressing CSIS's whistleblower treatment, and fighting the far-right People's Party of Canada for defamation.

The Supreme Court of Canada, where our team is fighting Bill 21.

REPORT AN INCIDENT

If you have experienced or witnessed an incident of hate or injustice, let us know. Report here, and we will take care of the rest.

We work with government bodies and public sector organizations that are looking for help at building safe and respectful workplaces.

NCCM’s legal support program is supported by our donors, and that way, we can support anyone targeted by Islamophobia without them having to pay a massive legal bill.

NCCM’s legal team has successfully struck down government policies, had clients get their lives back after employment discrimination issues, and helped clients being unfairly targeted by national security agencies.

CASE STUDY

WE DEFEATED BILL 62

NCCM and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) successfully defeated Quebec’s Bill 62 in December 2017.

This law, passed on October 18, 2017, stated that people needed to show their faces to receive government services. This particularly affected Muslim women who wear face coverings like burqas or niqabs.

The NCCM and CCLA took this case to court. In court, we argued that forcing people to show their faces for basic services went against the freedom of religion protected by the Canadian and Quebec Charters. The Quebec Superior Court agreed and temporarily blocked the law.

Although Bill 62 was defeated, a similar law, Bill 21, has since been introduced. Our team is working hard to fight Bill 21 at the Supreme Court of Canada.

NCCM and the CCLA’s legal counsel with Marie-Michelle Lacoste, the claimant in the case.

OUR CASES

Subscribe to get regular updates on our cases.

When Canadian Muslims face discrimination, we fight back. Whether it’s Islamophobic workplace policies, unjust detainments, or schools failing to accommodate religious practices, our legal team is ready to step in. 

Islamophobes and hate-mongers have no place in Canada. That’s why we intervened in the case against Kevin J. Johnston when he spread hateful and violent rhetoric against Canadian Muslims. Our legal team played a key role in holding him accountable, ensuring that those who incite hate face real consequences. We also took legal action against the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) after a local activist in Winnipeg was defamed, making it clear that political actors must be held responsible for their words and actions.

Discriminatory laws and policies threaten the rights of Canadian Muslims every day. Whether it’s unfair travel bans, racial profiling, or government policies that disproportionately target Muslims, we take legal action to challenge and overturn unjust regulations. Our legal work extends beyond individual cases—we advocate for systemic change to ensure that bad policies don’t just get repealed, but that they are never put in place again.

OUR SUPREME COURT CASES

We help corporations and private sector clients that want to get beyond a one-off checkmark activity. Employer accounts are easy to set up and tailored to your needs to provide a high quality impactful product that helps train employees to challenge Islamophobia, racism, and all forms of hate. They include appropriate pricing packages and make it easy to order and distribute training, track progress, and create appropriate training reports.

We work with government bodies and public sector organizations that are looking for help at building safe and respectful workplaces.

What role does anti-racism play in shaping the teaching profession? How can educators help students engage thoughtfully with complex issues like emergency powers, DEI, and free speech? Where do we set the boundaries on religious freedoms? How do we navigate the tension between free speech and hate speech in the classroom? Avoiding these discussions sends one message—opening them sends another. How do we create a space where debate is both meaningful and respectful?

What role does anti-racism play in shaping the teaching profession? How can educators help students engage thoughtfully with complex issues like emergency powers, DEI, and free speech? Where do we set the boundaries on religious freedoms? How do we navigate the tension between free speech and hate speech in the classroom? Avoiding these discussions sends one message—opening them sends another. How do we create a space where debate is both meaningful and respectful?

We help corporations and private sector clients that want to get beyond a one-off checkmark activity. Employer accounts are easy to set up and tailored to your needs to provide a high quality impactful product that helps train employees to challenge Islamophobia, racism, and all forms of hate. They include appropriate pricing packages and make it easy to order and distribute training, track progress, and create appropriate training reports.

We work with government bodies and public sector organizations that are looking for help at building safe and respectful workplaces.

What role does anti-racism play in shaping the teaching profession? How can educators help students engage thoughtfully with complex issues like emergency powers, DEI, and free speech? Where do we set the boundaries on religious freedoms? How do we navigate the tension between free speech and hate speech in the classroom? Avoiding these discussions sends one message—opening them sends another. How do we create a space where debate is both meaningful and respectful?

WE STAND AGAINST HATE AND PROTECT CIVIL LIBERTIES BY...

  • Public Interest Litigation
    Over the years, NCCM has led some of the most critical legal battles in Canada—from challenging discriminatory laws like Bill 21, to defending humanitarian aid organizations like UNRWA, to holding judges accountable, like in the Rania El-Alloul case.
  • Defend the civil liberties of our communities in the courts
    From helping the families of the London terror attack and the Quebec City Mosque attack, to taking on CSIS over its treatment of whistleblowers, to suing the far-right People’s Party of Canada for defamation, we fight for justice at every level.
  • Coordinating a Movement of Lawyers 
    For lawyers and law students who want to give back to Canada on some of the most important civil liberties battles of our time, join the fight.

OUR IMPACT

The percentage increase of calls to NCCM's legal team in the past year of Canadian Muslims dealing with the massive uptick of Islamophobia. ​
0 %
Number of Know Your Rights workshops delivered in the last two years to Canadians across the country.
0
The number of legal cases we took on in 2024, as we saw a massive spike of Islamophobia. NCCM has continued to serve our community by making sure that we were there to defend them.
0 +

OUR CASES

Hillel Case

We stood by the Social Justice Centre at the University of British Columbia’s downtown campus after “I [heart] Hamas” stickers with the Centre’s logo were found across campus.

It was revealed that the stickers were made by a former employee at Hillel BC.

We helped the Social Justice Centre pursue legal action after the stickers led to various cases of harassment against advocates associated with the Centre who have spoken out on Palestinian human rights.

UNWRA

We advocated hard for Canada to stop its suspension for funding UNRWA, the main UN agency providing life-saving aid and services to Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.

Funding has since been successfully restored and we are ready to show up in court to fight any future attempts to stop or suspend funding to UNRWA.

Kaffala Ban

Our team fought hard against a ban imposed years ago that bans adoptions from several Muslim-majority countries.

Such a ban falsely stipulates that the Islamic principle of guardianship (kafala) can not serve as the basis for adoption.

This is a discriminatory and inhumane directive that prevents fair adoptions from taking place and we will continue to fight against it in court.