Hijab Ban
(Bill 21)
We’re challenging Bill 21 to defend the rights of public sector employees who are banned from wearing religious symbols, including the hijab.
WHAT’S HAPPENING
Hijab Ban (Bill 21)
NCCM is currently engaged in one of the most important civil liberties battles in the country. We are heading to the Supreme Court of Canada with our partners, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Bill 21 bans public sector employees, including teachers, police officers, and government lawyers, from wearing religious symbols such as the hijab, kippah or turban. This disproportionately affects Muslim women, forcing them to choose between their faith and their careers.
READ MORE
Bill 21 raises serious concerns about religious freedom and equality in Canada. It undermines the rights of religious minorities to express their faith freely in the public sphere. The Quebec government’s use of the notwithstanding clause to shield Bill 21 from Charter challenges sets a dangerous precedent that could erode fundamental rights and freedoms across Canada. NCCM is currently engaged in the country’s most important civil liberties battle, and we are taking it to the Supreme Court of Canada with our partners, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.

PHOTO: Ömer Faruk Yıldız

PHOTO: Ömer Faruk Yıldız
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Appealed Bill 21 at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Mobilized all major federal parties to commit to intervening against Bill 21 at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Encouraged all cities and provinces across Canada to raise their voices in opposition to Bill 21.
IMPORTANT STATISTICS
A SNAPSHOT | OUR WORK
June 2019Bill 21 passed in court. NCCM filed with CCLA the next day to fight it.
On June 16, 2025, it will be six years since Quebec’s Bill 21, officially known as An Act Respecting the Laicity of the State, was passed into law. That law bans Quebecers who wear religious symbols (such as a turban, hijab, or kippah) from being employed in several public-sector jobs.
This was done in the name of the “neutrality” of the state, but it has done little more than produce second-class citizenship
2019NCCM urged all cities, provinces, and the federal government to speak out and oppose Bill 21.
Our advocacy team raised their voices, met officials, hosted press conferences, and built interfaith coalitions crying out for action.
At the NCCM, we have been at the forefront of the fight against Bill 21, Quebec’s discriminatory secularism law that bans public sector workers from wearing religious symbols. Through persistent advocacy, community mobilization, and strategic engagement, we have successfully pushed provincial leaders across Canada to take a stand against this unjust law.
July 2019Premier of Manitoba speaks up against Bill 21.
Among provinces, Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister was the first to go public on Bill 21 on July 4, saying that “there has been relative silence on this issue.”
The Manitoba government took out newspaper and electronic advertisements in Quebec that welcome civil servants there to move to Manitoba if they feel threatened by their province’s ban on religious symbols in the workplace.
“Here in Manitoba, we have respect for diversity,” Pallister said Wednesday in an interview with The Canadian Press. “We respect personal freedoms and rights, and we’re not big on clothing police here.”
2019Provinces across Canada raise their voices against Bill 21.
Ontario, Alberta, BC, and Nova Scotia came out strongly to argue that Bill 21 was discriminatory.
We worked tirelessly to make sure that all voices in Canada and in Quebec were being raised to point out the impact of discriminatory legislation. In Ontario, for example, we worked hard to pass a unanimous consent motion with the support of all parties to stand against Bill 21.
2019The Federal Government publicly condemns Bill 21.
After the bill passed, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau eventually expressed concern about its impact on fundamental rights, stating that he had not ruled out federal intervention.
We engaged in direct advocacy, met with federal leaders, and organized public pressure campaigns to ensure that the federal government acknowledged the impact of Bill 21.
Years later, the federal government finally committed to intervening against Bill 21 at the Supreme Court of Canada.
2019NCCM successfully advocates with the United Nations (UN) and human rights observers to warn Quebec about Bill 21.
After our engagement, high-ranking human rights monitors with the United Nations raised concerns that the Quebec government will violate fundamental freedoms if it moves ahead with legislation to limit.
Three UN legal experts, known as rapporteurs, signed and sent a letter to the Canadian mission in Geneva. They asked the diplomats to share the letter with Quebec’s Legislature.
“We are particularly concerned … about consequences for those people susceptible to being disadvantaged or excluded from a job or public position because of the potential effects of the proposed law,” the letter reads.
2021Federal election debate about Bill 21.
At the beginning of the English leaders’ debate, moderator Shachi Kurl asked Blanchet why he supported bills 21 and 96, Quebec’s secularism law and its proposed new law to protect the French language.
“You denied that Quebec has problems with racism, yet you defend legislation such as bills 96 and 21, which marginalize religious minorities, anglophones, and allophones,” asked Kurl. “Quebec is recognized as a distinct society, but for those outside the province, please help them understand why your party also supports these discriminatory laws.”
This became a controversial set of questions for daring to ask how Bill 21 exists.
2021Fatemeh Anvari removed from classroom for wearing hijab to national and provincial outcry.
An elementary school teacher in Chelsea, Quebec was told she could no longer teach in class because she wears a hijab, which is Quebec law under Bill 21.
After working several months as a substitute teacher with the Western Quebec School Board, Fatemeh Anvari was asked to apply for a more permanent position teaching a Grade 3 class at Chelsea Elementary School.
Anvari began that job earlier this fall, but after just one month the school principal told her she had to move to a position outside the classroom because she wears a hijab.
The removal of a Canadian teacher for wearing a hijab in the classroom sparked widespread condemnation of a controversial law in the province of Quebec, which critics say unfairly targets ethnic minorities under the pretext of secularism. NCCM worked closely with Fatemeh to make sure her story was told.
2024New NCCM and York University study on economic and social impact on Muslim women in Quebec.
The CAQ government also insists, with little proof, that the law’s so-called neutrality has led to social harmony and integration. But a new study by the National Council of Canadian Muslims on the work experiences of Muslim women in Quebec since Bill 21 indicates that the opposite is true. More than half of the 411 Muslim women surveyed for the study have experienced some sort of racist or Islamophobic harassment at work. Seventeen per cent have experienced physical aggression at the hands of their supervisors, colleagues and/or clients.
In fact, the study, one of the largest of its kind since Bill 21 passed, found that Muslim women face higher rates of discrimination and racism at every stage of their employment journey versus the general population in Quebec. For instance, more than 50 per cent of women reported an increase in questions about their religious identity in job interviews since Bill 21 became law, compared to less than 6 per cent of the general population. Similarly, 25 per cent of women reported that their religious identity had come up in conversations about career advancement since Bill 21 became law, compared to 5 per cent of the general population surveyed.
Are we surprised? After five years of Bill 21, the evidence shows that it’s having a disproportionately negative impact on religious minorities – especially Muslim women who wear a hijab. It was obvious from the start, as so many civil-liberties and community groups pointed out: When people are treated as less than equal, and when discrimination against them is legalized and legitimized, their lives deteriorate.
In fact, when justifying Bill 21 in a 2019 interview with Radio-Canada, Quebec Premier François Legault stated that “sometimes you have to give a little to the majority” (translated from French). The “little” he gave was nothing less than our rights.
The negative impacts of this decision were detailed by many of the women who were surveyed in the NCCM report. Sixty-four per cent expressed mistrust of the government, and many conveyed a feeling of dread, as they worried about which of their rights might be taken away next by this government.
Eighty-eight per cent of Muslim women surveyed also felt that Quebec has become a less welcoming place to live. Ninety per cent felt that it is a less welcoming place to work. For this growing majority, Quebec is becoming unlivable; 71 per cent of Muslim women surveyed are considering leaving the province altogether, and 73 per cent have considered or have already applied for work outside of Quebec. Sixty-six per cent of Muslim women are considering applying for work within Muslim-owned businesses and community organizations, leading to concerns around the ghettoization of the community and further social discord.
2025NCCM granted leave to appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada.
We urge all Canadians and Quebecers to stand up now and raise their voices and to protect the Charter.
OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES STILL AT RISK
Our team is under-resourced and overworked.
You can help them strengthen their impact by donating today.
JOIN THE FIGHT
Make Your Voice Heard
Unjust laws change when voices come together.
By sending an email today, you help push for stronger policies to combat Islamophobia and discrimination.
Volunteer
Help us protect our rights and shape policy.
Join the Movement
Join our email list below to help end Islamophobia in Canada.
Donate
Your donation supports legal aid, advocacy for policy change, and the fight against Islamophobia at every level.